Ms. Vogt gave the staff presentation with ms. Girvan present on behalf of the application. Mr. Musso commented that the proposed waterproofing method was not technically within vcc design guidelines, but may be found approvable in this situation. Ms. Girvan explained her concerns regarding maintenance of the 616 ursulines property, due to the portion of wall which crosses the property line and bears on the rear wall of 1031 chartres. Mr. Fifield stated that the proposed waterproofing plan was excellent, and then referred to staffs concerns regarding general notes item 3, which proposed to firmly grout and embed all wood framing members within the replaced brick wall. Mr. Fifield agreed with staff opinion that material shifting could be problematic if the floor joists were grouted, and recommended that the joists are pocketed per typical practice. Mr. Fifield also suggested waterproofing option a, and requested that the applicant to provide dimensions on the drawings resubmitted to staff